Meta AI Interviews - The Complete Playbook
Reading time: ~38 min | Interview relevance: Critical | Roles: ML Engineer, Research Scientist, Applied Scientist
The Real Interview Moment
You are in a virtual interview room with a Meta ML engineer. They share their screen and say, "You're on the Instagram team. We've noticed that our Reels recommendation quality has dropped for new users who have fewer than 10 interactions. Walk me through how you'd diagnose and fix this cold-start problem."
This is not an abstract ML question. This is a Meta ML question. The interviewer wants to see that you understand Meta's products at a deep level - that you know Instagram Reels competes with TikTok for attention, that new user onboarding directly impacts revenue, and that the solution must work within Meta's existing recommendation infrastructure. They want product sense layered on top of ML expertise.
At Meta, the best ML engineers are not just technically excellent. They think like product managers who happen to know how to build models.
What You Will Master
- The complete Meta AI/ML interview pipeline and how it differs from Google
- Meta's ML system design rounds with recommendation systems focus
- Product sense for ML - the skill most candidates lack
- How to demonstrate Meta values in behavioral rounds
- Levels E3-E7 and what each level expects
- Meta AI Research (FAIR) vs. applied ML career paths
- Compensation structure and negotiation strategies
Part 1 - The Meta Interview Pipeline
Overview
Meta's interview process is faster and more streamlined than Google's. There is no hiring committee - the hiring manager has significant influence over the decision.
Timeline
| Stage | Duration | Typical Wait After |
|---|---|---|
| Application to recruiter screen | 1-3 weeks | - |
| Recruiter screen | 30 min | 1 week |
| Phone screen | 45 min | 1-2 weeks |
| Onsite | 4-5 hours (1 day) | 1-2 weeks |
| Debrief + decision | 1 week | 1-3 days |
| Total | 5-10 weeks | - |
Meta's process is typically 3-6 weeks faster than Google's because there is no hiring committee or separate team matching phase. You interview for a specific team (or a small set of teams), and the hiring manager is involved in the decision. This means the hiring manager's opinion carries much more weight than at Google.
Part 2 - Stage-by-Stage Breakdown
Stage 1: Recruiter Screen (30 min)
Similar to Google but with one key difference: Meta recruiters often target specific teams, so they will ask about your interest in particular product areas.
Key questions to prepare for:
- "Which Meta products are you most interested in from an ML perspective?"
- "Tell me about a time you used data to inform a product decision."
- "What's your experience with recommendation systems / NLP / computer vision?"
How to answer the product question: Do not say "I want to work on anything." Instead: "I'm particularly interested in the recommendation challenges in Instagram Reels. The cold-start problem for new users and the challenge of balancing engagement with content diversity are fascinating ML problems. I also find the work FAIR is doing on self-supervised learning compelling."
Stage 2: Technical Phone Screen (45 min)
Meta phone screens are almost always coding-only. You will solve 1-2 coding problems on CoderPad.
What is different from Google:
- You use a real code editor (CoderPad), not Google Docs
- You are expected to write runnable code
- Problems tend to be slightly easier than Google (medium difficulty) but you must solve them faster
- You may get 2 problems instead of 1
Time allocation for 2 problems:
| Time | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0-2 min | Problem 1: read and clarify |
| 2-5 min | Problem 1: discuss approach |
| 5-18 min | Problem 1: code and test |
| 18-20 min | Transition to Problem 2 |
| 20-22 min | Problem 2: read and clarify |
| 22-25 min | Problem 2: discuss approach |
| 25-40 min | Problem 2: code and test |
| 40-45 min | Questions for interviewer |
Meta phone screens are fast-paced. If you spend more than 20 minutes on Problem 1, you will not have enough time for Problem 2. Even if your Problem 1 solution is perfect, failing to attempt Problem 2 is often a rejection. Practice speed.
Stage 3: Onsite Interview (4-5 Rounds)
The Meta onsite for ML roles typically has this structure:
| Round | Duration | Type | What It Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 45 min | Coding | Algorithms and data structures |
| Round 2 | 45 min | Coding | Second coding problem (different topic) |
| Round 3 | 45 min | ML System Design | End-to-end ML system for a Meta product |
| Round 4 | 45 min | Behavioral | Meta values, past experience, product sense |
| Round 5 (E5+) | 45 min | ML System Design or Execution | Additional depth round for senior levels |
For Research Scientist roles at FAIR, one coding round is typically replaced with a research discussion round where you present your work and discuss recent papers. For Applied Scientist roles, the second system design round may focus on experimentation and A/B testing.
Part 3 - The Meta Coding Rounds
Coding at Meta vs. Google
| Dimension | Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Environment | CoderPad (runnable code) | Google Docs (plain text) |
| Number of problems | Often 2 per round | Usually 1 per round |
| Difficulty | Medium (occasionally hard) | Medium-Hard |
| Time pressure | High (speed matters) | Moderate (depth matters) |
| Follow-ups | Common (optimize your first solution) | Less common |
| Language | Python preferred | Python or C++ |
Most Common Meta Coding Topics
| Topic | Frequency | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Arrays/Strings | Very High | Subarray sum, string manipulation, sliding window |
| Hash Maps | Very High | Two sum variants, frequency counting, grouping |
| Trees | High | Binary tree traversal, LCA, serialization |
| Graphs | Medium-High | BFS/DFS, shortest path, connected components |
| Dynamic Programming | Medium | Subsequences, coin change variants |
| Linked Lists | Medium | Merge, reverse, cycle detection |
| Stacks/Queues | Medium | Valid parentheses, monotonic stack |
| Sorting | Medium | Custom sort, merge intervals |
Meta Coding Tips
- Speed is king - solve medium problems in 15-18 minutes, not 25
- Write runnable code - the CoderPad environment lets you run tests; use it
- Handle edge cases proactively - empty arrays, single elements, negative numbers
- When you get a follow-up, optimize in-place rather than rewriting from scratch
- Python idioms matter - use list comprehensions,
collections.Counter,defaultdictnaturally
Sample Meta Coding Problem
Problem: "Given a list of intervals representing meetings, find the minimum number of conference rooms required."
What the interviewer evaluates:
- Do you recognize this as an interval scheduling problem?
- Can you implement the sweep line approach efficiently?
- Can you handle edge cases (overlapping meetings, single meeting)?
- Can you optimize from O(n^2) to O(n log n)?
- Bonus: can you discuss how this relates to resource allocation in ML training?
Part 4 - ML System Design at Meta
Why Meta's ML System Design Is Different
Meta's ML system design rounds are heavily product-focused. You are not designing an abstract ML system - you are designing a system for a specific Meta product.
The Meta ML system design formula:
Product Context + ML Formulation + System Architecture + Metrics + Trade-offs
Common Meta ML System Design Questions
| Question | Product Area | Key Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Design Instagram's Reels recommendation system | Cold start, content understanding, engagement optimization | |
| Design Facebook's News Feed ranking | Multi-objective optimization, fairness, real-time personalization | |
| Design a harmful content detection system | Trust & Safety | Multi-modal, scale (billions of posts), recall vs. precision |
| Design Facebook Marketplace's product recommendation | Marketplace | Intent understanding, visual features, location-based ranking |
| Design WhatsApp's spam detection system | End-to-end encryption constraints, limited signals | |
| Design Instagram's Explore page | User interest modeling, content diversity, cold start | |
| Design a click-through rate prediction model for ads | Ads | Feature engineering, calibration, latency constraints |
| Design a people-you-may-know recommendation system | Graph features, privacy, deduplication |
The Meta ML System Design Framework
What Makes a Strong Meta System Design Answer
Step 1: Product Understanding
- Articulate the user problem (not just the ML problem)
- Identify stakeholders (users, advertisers, content creators, regulators)
- Define what "success" looks like from a product perspective
Step 2: Metrics
Meta uses a multi-layer metrics framework:
| Metric Type | Examples | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| North Star | Daily Active Users, Time Spent | Overall product health |
| Primary | Engagement rate, CTR, conversion | Direct optimization target |
| Secondary | Content diversity, creator distribution | Quality constraints |
| Guardrail | Hate speech rate, misinformation rate, user complaints | Things that must not get worse |
Never propose optimizing only for engagement without mentioning guardrail metrics. Meta interviewers specifically watch for whether you consider negative externalities. "Maximize time spent" without discussing content quality, user well-being, or safety guardrails is a red flag.
Step 3: Feature Engineering
Meta-scale feature engineering has unique patterns:
| Feature Category | Examples | Meta-Specific Details |
|---|---|---|
| User features | Demographics, interests, social graph, past behavior | Meta has the world's richest social graph data |
| Item features | Content type, creator info, engagement history, visual features | Multi-modal features (text + image + video) |
| Context features | Time of day, device, location, session context | Critical for mobile-first products |
| Cross features | User-item similarity, social endorsement, creator-viewer affinity | Leverage the social graph for collaborative signals |
Step 4: Model Architecture
Meta's recommendation systems typically follow a two-stage pipeline:
- Retrieval: Embedding-based nearest neighbor search, collaborative filtering, rule-based candidate sources
- Ranking: Deep learning models (DLRM - Meta's Deep Learning Recommendation Model), feature interactions, multi-task learning
- Re-ranking: Diversity injection (MMR), safety filters, business rules
Step 5: Serving at Meta Scale
| Constraint | Meta's Reality | Design Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Users | 3+ billion DAU | Distributed serving, edge caching |
| Latency | <200ms P99 for feed | Model compression, feature caching |
| Throughput | Millions of QPS | Horizontal scaling, load balancing |
| Freshness | Real-time updates | Online learning, streaming features |
| Cost | Must be profitable | Efficient inference, model distillation |
Step 6: Experimentation
Meta runs thousands of A/B tests simultaneously. Your design should include:
- How you would set up the experiment (control vs. treatment)
- What metrics you would track (primary + guardrails)
- How long to run the experiment (statistical significance)
- How to handle metric trade-offs (engagement up but quality down)
- Long-run vs. short-run effects (novelty effects)
In Meta ML system design, always use this structure: "First, let me understand the product problem. Second, let me define metrics - both what we want to optimize and what we must not break. Third, let me walk through the features, model, and serving architecture. Finally, let me discuss how we'd experiment and iterate." This structure mirrors how Meta ML teams actually work.
Part 5 - Product Sense for ML
What Is Product Sense?
Product sense is the ability to connect ML solutions to user and business problems. It is the single most important differentiator in Meta ML interviews.
What product sense looks like in practice:
| Without Product Sense | With Product Sense |
|---|---|
| "We'll use a transformer model to rank content" | "New users churn because the feed isn't relevant yet. We need to solve the cold-start problem - using social graph signals (what do their friends engage with?) and onboarding preferences to bootstrap recommendations before we have behavioral data." |
| "We'll optimize for click-through rate" | "CTR alone leads to clickbait. We should optimize a composite metric: engagement-weighted by content quality scores, with guardrails on reshare diversity and creator distribution." |
| "We'll add more features to the model" | "Before adding features, we should understand why the model is failing. Is it a data problem (insufficient labels for new content types), a feature problem (missing signals), or a model capacity problem? Let's look at error analysis first." |
How to Develop Product Sense
- Use Meta products daily for 2 weeks before your interview - not casually, but analytically
- Notice ML decisions: "Why did Instagram show me this Reel? What signals informed this?"
- Read Meta's engineering blog - especially posts about recommendation systems and integrity
- Think about trade-offs: "If Meta optimized purely for engagement, what would go wrong?"
- Study Meta's public metrics: DAU, revenue per user, engagement trends
Product Sense Questions You Might Get
- "Instagram Reels engagement is flat. How would you diagnose and improve it?"
- "We're launching a new feature for Facebook Groups. How would you design the ML system to surface relevant Groups to users?"
- "Users are complaining about seeing too many ads in their feed. How would you balance ad revenue with user experience?"
- "How would you measure whether a recommendation system change is actually good for users, not just engagement?"
Part 6 - Behavioral Interviews at Meta
Meta Values
Meta's behavioral interview evaluates you against these core values:
| Value | What It Means | How to Demonstrate |
|---|---|---|
| Move Fast | Ship quickly, iterate, don't let perfect be the enemy of good | Tell a story about shipping under time pressure with trade-offs |
| Be Bold | Take risks, tackle hard problems, have ambitious goals | Tell a story about proposing a novel approach or challenging convention |
| Focus on Long-Term Impact | Build for the future, not just quick wins | Tell a story about technical debt reduction or foundational infrastructure |
| Build Awesome Things | Craft excellence, care about quality | Tell a story about going above and beyond on product quality |
| Be Open | Transparent communication, give/receive feedback | Tell a story about sharing bad news or giving difficult feedback |
| Live in the Future | Think about where things are going, not just where they are | Tell a story about anticipating a trend or preparing for future scale |
Meta Behavioral Questions
Common questions:
- "Tell me about the most impactful project you've worked on." (Impact + product sense)
- "Describe a time you had to move fast and make trade-offs." (Move Fast)
- "Tell me about a time you took a big risk on a project." (Be Bold)
- "Describe a time you disagreed with your manager." (Be Open)
- "Tell me about a time a project failed. What happened?" (Learning orientation)
- "How do you prioritize when you have multiple competing projects?" (Execution)
How Meta Behavioral Differs from Google
| Dimension | Google (Googleyness) | Meta (Values) |
|---|---|---|
| Emphasis | Collaboration, humility | Speed, impact, boldness |
| What they penalize | Arrogance, rigidity | Slow execution, risk aversion |
| Story length | 3-5 minutes | 2-3 minutes (shorter, punchier) |
| Follow-up style | Probing depth | Probing breadth (more stories) |
| Product awareness | Nice to have | Essential |
Meta interviewers expect you to have strong opinions about Meta products. "I don't use Instagram" is a conversation killer. Even if you prefer other products, spend 2 weeks using Meta products before your interview and form thoughtful opinions about what's working and what isn't.
Part 7 - Levels and Expectations
Meta Level System
| Level | Title | YoE (typical) | Scope | Interview Expectations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E3 | SWE | 0-2 years | Tasks and small features | Solid coding, basic ML, enthusiasm |
| E4 | SWE | 2-5 years | Features and projects | Strong coding, ML breadth, product awareness |
| E5 | Senior SWE | 5-8 years | Projects and tech direction | Excellent coding, ML depth, system design, leadership |
| E6 | Staff SWE | 8-12 years | Org-level direction | Architecture, cross-team impact, strategic thinking |
| E7 | Senior Staff | 12+ years | Company-wide impact | Industry expertise, organizational leadership |
Level Calibration Details
E3-E4 (Junior/Mid):
- Coding: Solve both problems correctly within time
- ML: Understand fundamentals, can discuss common models
- System design: Not expected to be strong (E3) or basic competency (E4)
- Behavioral: Show learning orientation and collaboration
E5 (Senior) - the most common Meta ML interview level:
- Coding: Solve both problems optimally with clean code
- ML: Deep expertise in one domain + breadth across all
- System design: Drive the full design with clear product thinking
- Behavioral: Show independent leadership, cross-team impact, mentoring
E6+ (Staff+):
- Coding: Still must be strong (Meta does not waive coding for senior levels)
- ML: Thought leader in your area, can drive technical strategy
- System design: Design complex multi-system architectures with organizational awareness
- Behavioral: Show organizational impact, influence, vision
Meta does not typically downlevel candidates the way Google does. If you interview for E5 and perform at E4 level, Meta is more likely to reject than to offer E4. They would rather you re-interview at the right level later. This makes level calibration before the interview critical.
Part 8 - Meta AI Research (FAIR) vs. Applied ML
Two Very Different Paths
Meta has two distinct AI career tracks, and the interview process differs significantly.
| Dimension | FAIR (Research) | Applied ML |
|---|---|---|
| Hiring focus | Publications, research taste | Product impact, engineering skill |
| Interview process | Research talk + coding + ML depth | Coding + system design + behavioral |
| Day-to-day | 70% research, 30% engineering | 20% research, 80% engineering |
| Publication | Encouraged, part of evaluation | Not expected |
| Typical background | PhD with strong publication record | MS/BS with industry experience |
| Team structure | Smaller, research-focused teams | Larger, product-focused teams |
| Impact measurement | Paper citations, benchmark improvements | User metrics, revenue impact |
| Compensation | Similar base, research bonuses | Similar base, higher equity potential |
FAIR Interview Specifics
If you are interviewing for FAIR:
- Research presentation (45 min): Present your best work (20 min talk + 25 min Q&A)
- Paper discussion: Discuss 2-3 recent papers in your area - strengths, weaknesses, extensions
- Research coding: Implement an ML algorithm or experiment from scratch
- Research taste: "If you had unlimited compute and 6 months, what would you work on?"
What FAIR values in research candidates:
- Novelty of ideas, not just execution
- Ability to identify the right problem
- Understanding of how your work connects to broader AI progress
- Strong mathematical foundations (linear algebra, probability, optimization)
- Clear communication of complex ideas
Applied ML Interview Focus
If you are interviewing for applied ML at Meta:
- Strong coding (two coding rounds, no shortcuts)
- Product-aware system design
- Experience with production ML systems
- Ability to work across teams with non-ML engineers
- Data-driven decision making
Part 9 - Compensation
2025/2026 Meta AI/ML Compensation (US)
| Level | Base Salary | Stock (Annual) | Bonus | Total Comp (Year 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E3 | $120-150K | $30-60K | 10% | $175-240K |
| E4 | $155-195K | $75-140K | 15% | $280-390K |
| E5 | $195-260K | $140-280K | 15% | $400-600K |
| E6 | $260-330K | $280-500K | 20% | $620-920K |
| E7 | $330-420K | $500K-1M+ | 25% | $950K-1.5M+ |
Meta compensation specifics:
- RSUs vest over 4 years with 25% per year (unlike Amazon's back-loaded vesting)
- Annual refresher grants are significant (often 50-100% of initial annual grant)
- Signing bonuses range from 200K+ (E6+)
- Meta typically offers higher base salary than Google but similar total comp
Negotiation tips:
- Meta will match competing offers aggressively - especially from Google and OpenAI
- Equity is the most flexible component - push here for maximum impact
- Signing bonus can be very large - use competing offer timelines as leverage
- Location matters - Menlo Park/NYC get the highest bands; remote gets 10-15% less
- E5 is the sweet spot for negotiation - largest level by headcount, most budget flexibility
Part 10 - Meta-Specific Preparation Strategies
The 4-Week Meta Prep Plan
Week 1: Coding Speed
- Solve 6 Meta-tagged LeetCode problems per day (30 total)
- Focus on medium difficulty, practice solving in 15-18 minutes
- Practice solving 2 problems in 45 minutes (simulate Meta's format)
- Use CoderPad or similar environment (not IDE)
Week 2: ML System Design with Product Focus
- Design 5 Meta-specific ML systems (see question list above)
- For each, start with the product problem, not the model
- Practice articulating metrics: primary, secondary, and guardrail
- Study Meta's DLRM paper and recommendation system architecture
Week 3: Product Sense and Behavioral
- Use Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp analytically for 1 week
- Prepare 6 STAR stories mapped to Meta values
- Practice articulating product opinions about Meta products
- Read Meta's engineering blog (10 recent posts)
Week 4: Integration and Mock Interviews
- Do 2 full mock interviews (coding + system design + behavioral)
- Practice explaining ML concepts with product context
- Research your target team at Meta
- Prepare questions for your interviewers
Meta-Specific Coding Tips
- Practice two-problem sets - Meta's format of 2 problems per round requires speed
- Know Python deeply - use
collections,itertools,heapqnaturally - Always optimize - if your first solution is O(n^2), the follow-up will be "can you do better?"
- Code readability matters - use meaningful variable names, add brief comments
- Test your code - in CoderPad, you can run tests; use this advantage
Meta-Specific System Design Tips
- Start with the product, not the model - "Let me first understand the user problem..."
- Always define multiple metric types - primary, secondary, guardrail
- Use two-stage retrieval + ranking - this is Meta's bread and butter
- Mention DLRM or similar Meta-style architectures - shows awareness of Meta's approach
- Discuss experimentation - A/B testing is central to Meta's ML culture
- Address content integrity - every recommendation system needs safety guardrails
Meta-Specific Behavioral Tips
- Lead with impact numbers - "I increased model accuracy by 15% which drove a 3% increase in DAU"
- Show speed - Meta values shipping fast over shipping perfectly
- Demonstrate boldness - talk about ambitious goals and calculated risks
- Be product-oriented - connect every story to user or business impact
- Show cross-functional collaboration - Meta ML engineers work closely with product managers and designers
Part 11 - Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
The Top 10 Meta AI Interview Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Hurts | How to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Slow coding | Cannot complete 2 problems in 45 min | Practice timed sets of 2 medium problems |
| 2. No product sense | System design feels disconnected from Meta's products | Use Meta products for 2 weeks, start every design with user problem |
| 3. Ignoring metrics | Cannot articulate what "success" means | Always define primary + guardrail metrics |
| 4. No social graph awareness | Missing Meta's unique data advantage | Mention social graph features in every recommendation design |
| 5. Treating behavioral as a throwaway | Miss chance to show alignment with Meta values | Prepare 6 stories mapped to Meta's specific values |
| 6. Not running code | Missing bugs that CoderPad would catch | Always run test cases in CoderPad |
| 7. Over-engineering system design | Spending too long on architecture, not enough on product | Time-box each section: 5 min product, 5 min metrics, 15 min design, 10 min scaling, 5 min experimentation |
| 8. No opinions about Meta products | Seems like you don't care about working there | Form genuine opinions before the interview |
| 9. Ignoring multi-modality | Meta's content is text + image + video | Always consider multi-modal signals in your designs |
| 10. Not asking about team specifics | Miss chance to show genuine interest | Prepare 3 specific questions about the team's ML challenges |
What Ex-Meta Interviewers Say
"The candidates who stand out are the ones who think like ML product managers. They don't just build models - they understand why the model matters for the product."
"Speed in coding rounds is not about writing fast - it's about recognizing patterns fast. If you immediately know this is a 'sliding window' problem, you can code it quickly. Pattern recognition comes from practice."
"In system design, I care less about whether you pick the 'right' model and more about whether you can articulate the trade-offs in your choices. There's no single right answer - there are well-reasoned answers and poorly-reasoned ones."
Part 12 - Insider Knowledge
What Meta Interviewers Actually Look For
Beyond the official rubric:
- Can you ship? - Meta values execution over perfection. Show that you deliver.
- Do you think about users? - Connect every technical decision to user impact.
- Can you handle ambiguity? - Meta moves fast; requirements change. Show adaptability.
- Are you data-driven? - "I think" < "The data shows." Always ground decisions in data.
- Do you have conviction? - Have strong opinions, but be willing to update them.
The Meta "DNA" Assessment
Informally, Meta interviewers assess whether you have "Meta DNA" - a combination of:
- Builder mindset: You want to build things that billions of people use
- Impact orientation: You measure yourself by outcomes, not effort
- Speed preference: You prefer launching and iterating over planning extensively
- Technical excellence: You hold yourself to a high bar even when moving fast
Post-Interview: The Debrief
Unlike Google's hiring committee, Meta uses a debrief meeting where:
- All interviewers meet with the hiring manager
- Each interviewer presents their assessment
- The hiring manager has significant influence on the final decision
- Borderline cases can be saved by a passionate advocate (interviewer or HM)
This means: if the hiring manager wants you, borderline scores are more likely to result in an offer than at Google.
Part 13 - Meta AI Interview Preparation Checklist
4 Weeks Out
- Solve 120 Meta-tagged LeetCode problems (mostly medium)
- Practice two-problem sets (45 min for 2 problems)
- Design 5 Meta-specific ML systems
- Start using Meta products analytically
- Read Meta AI blog posts (10 minimum)
- Study Meta's DLRM and recommendation architecture
1 Week Out
- Do 2 full mock interviews
- Prepare 6 STAR stories mapped to Meta values
- Prepare product opinions about Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp
- Prepare 3 questions for each interviewer type
- Review your target team's recent work
Day Before
- Light review only
- Review your STAR stories
- Check your interview logistics (virtual or in-person)
- Get 8 hours of sleep
Day Of
- Test your setup (if virtual: camera, mic, internet, CoderPad)
- Have water and a snack nearby
- Keep a timer visible during coding rounds
- Be ready to move fast - Meta interviews have a faster pace than Google
Next Steps
Meta's product-focused ML culture requires a different preparation strategy than Google's research-oriented approach. Understanding these differences is what separates well-prepared candidates from generic ones.
Next, explore how AI research labs interview differently - starting with the company at the frontier of LLM development: OpenAI Interviews.
