Skip to main content
Interactive 3D/Agent Debate and Critique Pattern
Debate Pattern
Factual Question
Round 0 / 3
R1
0.62
R2
0.74
R3
0.81
Press "Next Round" to begin the debate.
Task Type
Rounds3
14
Agents
💡
Proposer
Generates initial answer
🔍
Critic
Identifies flaws
Refiner
Incorporates feedback
Multi-agent debate converges toward higher quality through iterative critique and refinement.

Agent Debate and Critique Pattern - Interactive Visualization

The agent debate pattern uses multiple LLM agents with distinct roles to iteratively improve output quality. A Proposer generates an initial answer; a Critic identifies specific flaws, gaps, and inaccuracies; a Refiner incorporates the critique to produce a better version. Repeating this cycle across multiple rounds converges toward higher-quality, more complete answers - a form of structured self-refinement that outperforms single-pass generation on complex tasks.

  • Proposer generates an initial answer; quality is typically 0.55–0.65 on the first pass
  • Critic identifies concrete, specific flaws - not vague feedback - to drive meaningful improvement
  • Refiner incorporates critique to produce a measurably better answer each round
  • Quality scores consistently rise 0.15–0.25 points across 3 debate rounds across task types

Part of the EngineersOfAI Interactive 3D - free interactive visualizations covering every major concept in machine learning and AI engineering. Hover any element for a plain-English explanation. No code required.