Recommendation: OSS: medium scale, no strict privacy = OSS gives control without full build cost
Decision Controls
Team Size (ML Eng)5
120
Eng Hourly Rate$150
$80$300
Scale
Key insight: SaaS is cheapest until ~$50k/yr spend. After that, OSS or build typically wins on TCO - but you absorb the operational burden.
Vendor lock-in cost: switching a feature store after 2 years costs 3â6 months of eng time. Price that into the buy decision.
Build vs Buy ML Infrastructure - Interactive Visualization
Every ML team faces the same recurring question: build the infrastructure in-house, buy a SaaS solution, or adopt an open-source tool? The answer depends on team size, scale, data privacy requirements, and how much the component differentiates your product. SaaS is cheapest and fastest at small scale (under $50k/year). Open-source tools give you control without full build cost at medium scale. Building in-house only makes economic sense at large scale or when the capability is a genuine product differentiator. This calculator quantifies the total cost of ownership across feature store, model serving, experiment tracking, data pipeline, vector database, and monitoring - adjusted for your team size and scale.
Feature store: SaaS (Tecton) costs $3.5k/mo vs 16 weeks of eng time to build; OSS (Feast) is the middle path
Model serving: building a production-grade serving system takes 20+ eng-weeks - rarely justified below 1M req/day
Vendor lock-in cost: switching a feature store after 2 years costs 3â6 months of migration eng time
Data privacy forces build or OSS: regulated industries (healthcare, finance) cannot send data to SaaS vendors
Part of the EngineersOfAI Interactive 3D - free interactive visualizations covering every major concept in machine learning and AI engineering. Hover any element for a plain-English explanation. No code required.