Skip to main content
Interactive 3D/VAE vs GAN vs Diffusion
Training Controls
Model Comparison
VAE
Quality: 10%
Loss: 1.320
Stable (ELBO)
GAN
Quality: 0%
Loss: 1.225
Mode collapse: 35%
Unstable (minimax)
Diffusion
Quality: 8%
Loss: 1.160
Stable (score matching)
Grey dots = target distribution. Colored dots = generated samples. Watch them converge as training progresses.

VAE vs GAN vs Diffusion - Interactive Visualization

Three families dominate generative modeling. VAEs maximize a variational lower bound on likelihood, producing smooth latent spaces but somewhat blurry samples due to the reconstruction-regularization tradeoff. GANs are trained adversarially, producing sharp samples but suffering from mode collapse and training instability. Diffusion models iteratively denoise Gaussian noise and currently produce the best sample quality, but require hundreds of forward passes at inference time.

  • See VAE architecture: encoder to latent distribution, reparameterization trick, decoder to reconstruction - all trained end-to-end
  • Watch GAN training dynamics: the generator and discriminator loss curves and the adversarial dance between them
  • See diffusion forward process: clean image progressively corrupted with Gaussian noise across T timesteps
  • Compare sample quality across all three: diffusion wins on sharpness, VAE has the best-structured latent space for interpolation
  • Understand training stability rankings: VAE (stable) vs diffusion (stable) vs GAN (often diverges without tricks)

Part of the EngineersOfAI Interactive 3D - free interactive visualizations covering every major concept in machine learning and AI engineering. Hover any element for a plain-English explanation. No code required.