High queue depth - increase workers or reduce inference time
Use Sync when
Real-time UX required
Inference < 200ms
Simple request/response
Chatbots, search, autocomplete
Use Async when
Inference > 1s
Batch workloads
GPU-heavy generation
Video, document processing
Inference Controls
Inference Time
Latency1s
100ms10s
Concurrent Requests
req/sec10
1200
Async Delivery Mode
Display
Sync is simpler but blocks a thread per request.
Async decouples submission from result retrieval - critical for models with high inference latency or bursty traffic.
Sync vs Async Inference - Interactive Visualization
Synchronous inference blocks the client thread until the model returns a prediction - simple, but every worker slot is occupied for the full inference duration. Asynchronous inference decouples request submission from result retrieval: the client receives a job_id immediately, then either polls or receives a webhook when the result is ready. The tradeoff is latency vs throughput under load. For inference times above ~500ms or concurrency above a few dozen requests per second, async patterns dramatically reduce tail latency and improve hardware utilization.
Sync: one thread blocked per in-flight request - throughput limited to workers * (1000 / inference_ms)
Async with polling: client repeatedly queries a job endpoint - adds round-trip overhead but frees the client thread immediately
Async with webhooks: server pushes result when ready - lower overhead than polling, requires a publicly reachable callback URL
Queue depth is the key warning signal: when events arrive faster than they are processed, latency grows unboundedly
Part of the EngineersOfAI Interactive 3D - free interactive visualizations covering every major concept in machine learning and AI engineering. Hover any element for a plain-English explanation. No code required.